Seeman Bros. v. Osaka Shosen Kaisha

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a private college’s creation of a sexual harassment policy at the urging of a state commission did not make the private college’s firing of a professor a state action because the commission was not involved in the specific case
• making general statement that “[u]nder Vermont law, disputes concerning the agreed-upon terms and conditions of an employment contract are an issue of fact for the jury”
• “Under Vermont law, disputes concerning the agreed-upon terms and conditions of an employment contract are an issue of fact for the jury to decide.”
• “[A] state action occurs where the challenged action of a private party is fairly attributable to the state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).