Seeley v. Hunt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that no ERISA plan existed because the employer had yet to create an administrative scheme by which to distribute the trust
• ruling that although-informal plan did not exist, the class of beneficiaries was clear
• “In our view, [Donovan] requires more than just the: existence of ah administrative scheme. If a reasonable person cannot ascertain the claims procedures in a purported plan, then the plan is not an ‘employee benefit plan’ under ERISA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).