Seelbach Hotel Co. v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to reach the issue, but noting that “[s]ome courts have disagreed with th[e] reasoning [of the cases cited above], correctly recognizing the limitation this places on federal courts to enforce California’s consumer laws”
• the purpose of a warranty is to contractually mai% the point in time when the risk of paying for repairs shifts from the manufacturer to the consumer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).