Seegmiller v. LaVerkin City

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, although Lawrence did not recognize a fundamental right, it did recognize a “protected liberty interest”
• noting that Lawrence did not announce a fundamental right to private, consensual sexual activity as it was decided on rational basis review
• noting that there is no “fundamental liberty interest ‘to engage in a private act of consensual sex’”
• noting that Lawrence did not announce a fundamental right to private, consensual sexual activity as it was decided on rational basis review
• upholding termination of officer on basis of extramarital affair under rational basis test because there is no “fundamental liberty interest ‘to engage in a private act of consensual sex’”
• glossing Chavez v. Martinez, 538 U.S. 760, 775–76 (2003) (plurality opinion)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).