Seeburg v. Scottish American Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant could not offer hearsay statements against the government because the government was not a party to the conspiracy
• noting that the defendant “did not make any factual stipulations during the trial”
• finding conversation between husband and wife related to individual objectives or was merely idle chatter
• issue not raised in the district court or briefed to Court of Appeals could not be considered on appeal
• unmoved when the defendant’s “expression of remorse and guilt were tepid .A he stated only that he felt ‘pretty bad.”
• “Participation in the conspiracy’s common purpose and plan may be inferred from the defendant’s actions and reactions to the circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).