Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/2/1995
See v. Hartley
Citations
- 257 Kan. 813
- 896 P.2d 1049
- 1995 Kan. LEXIS 81
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the 4-year time bar of K.S.A. 60-513[c] is subject to the savings provision of K.S.A. 60-518 and the tolling provision of K.S.A. 65-4908
- addressing interaction between savings provision and statute of repose found in Kansas’s medical malpractice statute
- addressing interaction between savings provision and statute of repose found in Kansas’s medical malpractice statute
- saving statute “ ‘is intended to give a party who within the proper time brought an action which was disposed of otherwise than upon the merits after the statute of limitations had run [six months] of grace in which to reinstate his case and obtain a determination upon the merits’ ”
- the Kansas savings statute also says the plaintiff may bring a \new\ cause of action, but the court nonetheless found it applicable to the statute of repose
- “While there are differences between statutes of limitation and statutes of repose ... both types of statutes constitute time limitations on the plaintiffs right to recover”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holmes, Six
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cronin v. HoweTennessee Supreme Court· 1995-09-05· cited 167×
- Wilson v. Durrani (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-23· cited 89×
- Ripley v. TolbertSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-07-12· cited 45×
- Big League Entertainment, Inc. v. Brox Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-05-05· cited 42×
- Klose Ex Rel. Klose v. Wood Valley Racquet Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1999-04-16· cited 22×
- Smith v. GrahamSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-12-08· cited 18×
- Seaboard Corp. v. Marsh Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-08-31· cited 14×
- Hinkle v. HendersonSeventh Circuit· 1996-05-31· cited 10×
- Goldsmith v. Learjet, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1996-09-09· cited 9×
- Clanton v. EstivoCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1999-07-30· cited 9×
- Goldsmith v. Learjet, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1996-05-31· cited 6×
- Jain v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-01-20· cited 6×
- O'NEILL v. DunhamCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-03-20· cited 6×
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Nash Oil & Gas, Inc.D. Kansas· 2007-03-27· cited 4×
- Ternes v. GALICHIACourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-06-11· cited 4×
- Dierksen Ex Rel. Dierksen v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.D. Kansas· 1996-01-25· cited 3×
- Baughn v. Eli Lilly and Co.D. Kansas· 2005-02-04· cited 3×
- Hinkle ex rel. Hinkle v. HendersonSeventh Circuit· 1996-05-31· cited 2×
- Hayden Outdoors, Inc. v. NieburD. Kansas· 2014-01-28· cited 2×
- MORENO-GUTIERREZ v. NapolitanoD. Colorado· 2011-06-24· cited 1×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Martindale v. TennySupreme Court of Kansas· 1992-04-10· cited 179×
- Harding v. K.C. Wall Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-04-10· cited 109×
- State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Kansas Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-05-25· cited 81×
- Wright v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1993-03-15· cited 74×
- Rochester American Insurance v. Cassell Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1965-06-12· cited 22×
- Denton v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1907-06-08· cited 22×
- Rogers v. Williams, Larson, Voss, Strobel & EstesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1989-07-14· cited 21×
- Menne v. Celotex Corp.D. Kansas· 1989-09-13· cited 18×
- McMillen v. U.S.D. No. 380Supreme Court of Kansas· 1993-06-16· cited 13×
- Goldsberry v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1978-02-10· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.