See v. Hartley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the 4-year time bar of K.S.A. 60-513[c] is subject to the savings provision of K.S.A. 60-518 and the tolling provision of K.S.A. 65-4908
• addressing interaction between savings provision and statute of repose found in Kansas’s medical malpractice statute
• addressing interaction between savings provision and statute of repose found in Kansas’s medical malpractice statute
• saving statute “ ‘is intended to give a party who within the proper time brought an action which was disposed of otherwise than upon the merits after the statute of limitations had run [six months] of grace in which to reinstate his case and obtain a determination upon the merits’ ”
• the Kansas savings statute also says the plaintiff may bring a \new\ cause of action, but the court nonetheless found it applicable to the statute of repose
• “While there are differences between statutes of limitation and statutes of repose ... both types of statutes constitute time limitations on the plaintiffs right to recover”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).