Sedillo v. Levi-Strauss Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the statute of limitations did not commence while worker continued to perform all pre-injury job duties
• recognizing that a worker is not 11 charged with medical knowledge “which apparently transcends that possessed by the 12 attending physician” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).