· 5/5/1986
Sedgwick v. Giant Food, Inc.
Citations
- 110 F.R.D. 175
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25931
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a continuous enterprise and one act in furtherance thereof is all that is required to support a Travel Act conviction
- holding that a continuous enterprise and one act in furtherance thereof is all that is required to support a Travel Act conviction
- holding similar conduct not to violate due process
- holding similar conduct not to violate due process
- overt act listed as element
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gasch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.