· 7/19/1976
Security Insurance v. Daniels
Citations
- 245 N.W.2d 418
- 70 Mich. App. 100
- 1976 Mich. App. LEXIS 821
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- relying on Ketola v Frost, 375 Mich 266, 278-279; 134 NW2d 183 [1965]
- “We read ‘exclusive use’ as meaning ‘right to exclusive use.’ We do not think it is relevant that the [defendants] chose never to use the vehicle.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gillis, Allen, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.