Security General Life Insurance v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disqualification order was not appealable and special action jurisdiction was therefore ap propriate
• noting Ethical Rules “are not designed to be used as a means to disqualify counsel”
• accepting special action jurisdiction of denial of motion to disqualify opposing counsel
• Rule 3.7(a) requires a showing that the proposed testimony is relevant, material and unobtainable elsewhere
• Rule 3.7(a) ‘requires an even more specific showing of necessity’ than the former Code provisions
• lawyer disqualified in action against insurance company; lawyer’s testimony likely to be required to establish existence of oral contract with company

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).