Skip to main content
· 2/28/1985

Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Christian-Paine & Co.

Citations

  • 755 F.2d 359
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \an employer's attempts to lessen the adverse impact of an employment decision will not as a matter of law serve to toll the limitations period\
  • Plaintiffs “hope” for a new position, by itself, does not constitute reason to exercise equitable estoppel.
  • “[U]nder Ricks and its progeny unequivocal notice of termination is all that is required to start the limitations period running; it is not necessary for such notice to be in writing.”
  • “an employer’s attempts to lessen the adverse impact of an employment decision will not as a matter of law serve to toll the limitations period”
  • “[U]nder Ricks and its progeny unequivocal notice of termination is all that is required to start the limitations period running; it is not necessary for such notice to be in writing.”
  • “a generous sev- erance arrangement conditioned upon compliance with a code of silence would be a powerful inducement that might well lure an older worker into failing to defend his rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibbons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.