Skip to main content
· 5/25/1990

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Thomas James Associates, Inc.

Citations

  • 738 F. Supp. 88
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6428

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In determining the proper amount of restitution, a Court may consider as an offset the sums which a defendant paid to effect a fraudulent transaction.”
  • “[A] securities law violator [may not] avoid or diminish his responsibility to return his ill-gotten gains by establishing that he is no longer in possession of such funds due to subsequent, unsuccessful investments or other forms of discretionary spending.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Telesca

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.