Securities & Exchange Commission v. Slocum, Gordon, & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the SEC’s statistics showed defendants’ “trading strategy in operation”
• declining to impose liability in an alleged cherry-picking scheme because defendants explained, via testimonial evidence in a bench trial, how different trades represented a legitimate trading strategy
• explaining that “[p]otential conflicts of interest are always material”
• resolving such an argument favorably to the defendants after a bench trial
• “Potential conflicts of interest are always material.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).