· 5/15/2003
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Sargent
Citations
- 329 F.3d 34
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 9358
- 2003 WL 21092569
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “prejudgment interest, like the disgorgement remedy, is intended to deprive wrongdoers of profits they illegally obtained by violating the securities laws”
- noting that.a “one-tip tip” by a defendant who “did not personally realize any trades or direct profit” did not require civil penalties
- noting that the tippee “made no efforts to conceal his isolated transaction”
- “Requiring payment of interest prevents a defendant from obtaining the benefit of what amounts to an interest free loan procured as a result of illegal activity”
- declining to impose civil penalty where defendant “was criminally convicted” and faced one year of probation
- declining to assess civil penalty where defendant “made no efforts to conceal his isolated transaction”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Stahl, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.