Skip to main content
· 5/15/2003

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Sargent

Citations

  • 329 F.3d 34
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 9358
  • 2003 WL 21092569

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “prejudgment interest, like the disgorgement remedy, is intended to deprive wrongdoers of profits they illegally obtained by violating the securities laws”
  • noting that.a “one-tip tip” by a defendant who “did not personally realize any trades or direct profit” did not require civil penalties
  • noting that the tippee “made no efforts to conceal his isolated transaction”
  • “Requiring payment of interest prevents a defendant from obtaining the benefit of what amounts to an interest free loan procured as a result of illegal activity”
  • declining to impose civil penalty where defendant “was criminally convicted” and faced one year of probation
  • declining to assess civil penalty where defendant “made no efforts to conceal his isolated transaction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Stahl, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.