Skip to main content
· 7/10/1990

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Porto

Citations

  • 739 F. Supp. 1236
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8820
  • 1990 WL 96403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Claims under Section 26 1788.11(d) of the Rosenthal Act require the same proof of intent and are evaluated for 27 specificity in the same way as claims under Subsection 1692d(5) of the FDCPA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bua

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.