· 5/21/1992
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Oxford Capital Securities, Inc.
Citations
- 794 F. Supp. 104
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6961
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendants cannot raise a Fifth Amendment defense to production of accounting for the first time in a contempt proceeding
- Defendants waived Fifth Amendment privilege where they had once asserted the privilege in response to questions from the Securities & Exchange Commission, then entered into consent judgment with them
- “[D]efendants could have sought to condition their execution of the Judgments upon an agreement by the Commission to insert a provision preserving their Fifth Amendment privileges.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William C. Conner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.