Skip to main content
· 5/21/1992

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Oxford Capital Securities, Inc.

Citations

  • 794 F. Supp. 104
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6961

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendants cannot raise a Fifth Amendment defense to production of accounting for the first time in a contempt proceeding
  • Defendants waived Fifth Amendment privilege where they had once asserted the privilege in response to questions from the Securities & Exchange Commission, then entered into consent judgment with them
  • “[D]efendants could have sought to condition their execution of the Judgments upon an agreement by the Commission to insert a provision preserving their Fifth Amendment privileges.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William C. Conner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.