Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Executive Planners, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that scienter was not required to find violations under §§ 77e and 78o(a) (1)
• “The statute in question contains no language from which a scienter requirement may be derived.”
• “The statute in question contains no language from which a scienter requirement may be derived.”
• scienter is an issue for the fact finder to infer from all the evidence in the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).