Securities Exchange Commission v. Monarch Funding Corporation, Leo M. Eisenberg, Steven R. Cloyes, and Richard M. Cannistraro, Richard O. Bertoli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting absence of chance to litigate certain questions ' during sentencing but declining to announce a per se rule barring estoppel effect of sentencing findings
• refusing to give collateral estoppel effect to criminal sentencing findings in subsequent SEC civil action
• considering incentive to litigate with respect to collateral estoppel in sentencing hearings
• collateral estoppel \should be applied only in those circumstances where it is clearly fair and efficient to do so\
• cited by Lab. Corp. of Am. Holdings v. Metabolite Labs., Inc., 410 Fed.Appx. 151, 159 (10th Cir. 2011) (unpublished)
• “Essentially the same elements are required under Section 17(a)(1)—(3) in connection with the offer or sale of a security.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).