Securities & Exchange Commission v. McCaskey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that allowing estoppel defense to remain “would prejudice the SEC by needlessly lengthening and complicating the discovery process and trial of this matter’
• striking estoppel defense where defendants “offered nothing to suggest they detrimentally relied on any misrepresentation by the SEC, let alone that such reliance resulted in prejudice to their case of a constitutional magnitude”
• “[Section 21(g) ] has routinely been employed to dismiss third-party complaints and counterclaims because such additional claims protract litigation.” (internal citations omitted)
• Prejudice found where inclusion of a meritless defense would increase the time, expense and complexity of litigation.
• “An increase in the time, expense and complexity of a trial may constitute sufficient prejudice to warrant granting a plaintiff’s motion to strike.”
• officer and di rector bar

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• GEOMC Co., Ltd. v. Calmare Therapeutics Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2019-03-12· cited 186×
• Coach, Inc. v. Kmart Corporations
  S.D. New York· 2010-11-16· cited 67×
• United States v. East River Housing Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2015-03-02· cited 36×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Kelly
  S.D. New York· 2009-09-30· cited 23×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Penn
  S.D. New York· 2016-12-21· cited 20×
• City of New York v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2016-03-31· cited 16×
• U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. A.S. Templeton Group, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 2003-12-23· cited 14×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Alexander
  E.D. New York· 2007-09-26· cited 13×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Caledonian Bank Ltd.
  S.D. New York· 2016-09-28· cited 12×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Pinchas
  S.D. New York· 2006-03-27· cited 9×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Wyly
  S.D. New York· 2013-06-06· cited 9×
• Pergament v. Varela (In re Varela)
  E.D. New York· 2015-05-04· cited 8×
• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Cohen
  E.D. New York· 2018-07-12· cited 6×
• United States v. United States Steel Corp.
  N.D. Indiana· 2013-08-21· cited 3×
• John Doe v. Mama Taori's Premium Pizza, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2001-04-05
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. One or More Unknown Traders in the Common Stock of Certain Issuers
  District of Columbia· 2008-01-14
• Steven Santore v. Karloss Stevenson
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2018-02-20