Securities & Exchange Commission v. Loving Spirit Foundation Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the timeliness of section 144 affidavit for recusal where party waited more than two years after the first order of which it complained and over six months after the last
• rejecting the timeliness of section 144 affidavit for recusal where party waited more than two years after the first order of which it complained and over six months after the last
• “A receiver’s authority ... is defined solely by the order of the appointing court, which may provide for the administration of the receivership in any way it sees appropriate.” (internal quotations omitted)
• “[I]f disqualification were required merely as the result of [a party’s] disagreement with judicial conclusions reached in the course of litigation, the judicial system would grind to a halt.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• motion filed eight months after the rulings complained of is untimely
• doubts about two weeks’ delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).