Securities & Exchange Commission v. Incendy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring to Baxter and noting that the Constitution is not violated by forcing an individual to risk “non-criminal disadvantage” by remaining silent in a civil proceeding out of fear that he will incriminate himself in a subsequent criminal action
• referring to Baxter and noting that the Constitution is not violated by forcing an individual to risk “non-criminal disadvantage” by remaining silent in civil proceedings out of fear that he will incriminate himself in a subsequent criminal action
• referring to Baxter and noting that the Constitution is not violated by forcing an individual to risk \non-criminal disadvantage\ by remaining silent in civil proceedings out of fear that he will incriminate himself in a subsequent criminal action
• it is permissible for simultaneous or successive prosecution of civil and criminal actions and it is within the trial court’s discretion to stay the civil proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).