Securities & Exchange Commission v. Goren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to apply a blended rate because it \risks under — or over-compensating these professionals for their efforts\
• declining to apply a blended rate because it “risks under— or over-compensating these professionals for their efforts”
• deducting $20,000 from the fee application because defendant held too many conferenees
• approving hourly rates of up to $200 for a receiver’s attorneys in 2003
• courts have endorsed percentage cuts as a practical way of “trimming fat from a fee application.”
• “courts must exercise discretion to avoid even the appearance of a windfall.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).