Securities & Exchange Commission v. Goren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to apply a blended rate because it \risks under — or over-compensating these professionals for their efforts\
• declining to apply a blended rate because it “risks under— or over-compensating these professionals for their efforts”
• deducting $20,000 from the fee application because defendant held too many conferenees
• approving hourly rates of up to $200 for a receiver’s attorneys in 2003
• courts have endorsed percentage cuts as a practical way of “trimming fat from a fee application.”
• “courts must exercise discretion to avoid even the appearance of a windfall.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• James Mcdonald v. Pension Plan Of The Nysa-Ila Pension Trust Fund
  Second Circuit· 2006-06-06· cited 149×
• Stair v. Calhoun
  E.D. New York· 2010-06-01· cited 57×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Byers
  S.D. New York· 2008-12-30· cited 39×
• Malletier v. Apex Creative International Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2010-01-05· cited 30×
• Denney v. Jenkens & Gilchrist
  S.D. New York· 2005-02-18· cited 25×
• Bravia Capital Partners, Inc. v. Fike
  S.D. New York· 2013-04-22· cited 21×
• McDonald v. Pension Plan of the NYSA-ILA Pension Trust Fund
  Second Circuit· 2006-06-06· cited 18×
• Flaa v. Manor Country Club
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-09-08· cited 6×
• Kaiser v. JBC Legal Group P.C.
  E.D. New York· 2008-12-18· cited 6×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hensley v. Eckerhart
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
• Blum v. Stenson
  Supreme Court· 1984-03-21· cited 7,642×
• New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New York
  Second Circuit· 1983-06-15· cited 1,038×
• Goldberger v. Integrated Resources, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2000-03-28· cited 476×
• F.H. Krear & Co. v. Nineteen Named Trustees
  Second Circuit· 1987-01-20· cited 239×
• Savino v. Computer Credit, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1998-12-21· cited 206×
• Oliver S. Brown v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Etc., Mobil Oil Corporation, Ashland Oil, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1988-03-02· cited 178×
• Connolly v. Harris Trust Co.
  Tenth Circuit· 2002-10-31· cited 86×
• United States Football League v. National Football League
  Second Circuit· 1989-10-10· cited 56×
• Savoie v. Merchants Bank
  Second Circuit· 1999-01-28· cited 39×
• DeVito v. Hempstead China Shop, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1993-09-13· cited 28×
• Richard R. Satterwhite, Jr., for Himself and in Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. United Parcel Service, Inc., an Ohio Corporation
  Tenth Circuit· 1974-05-03· cited 26×
• Miltland Raleigh-Durham v. Myers
  S.D. New York· 1993-10-25· cited 21×
• White v. White Rose Food
  E.D. New York· 2000-02-07· cited 8×
• Eastern Technologies, Inc. v. Chem-Solv, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-10-23· cited 8×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Goren
  E.D. New York· 2002-05-28· cited 4×

Other cases named Securities & Exchange Commission v. Goren

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Goren
  E.D. New York· 2002-05-28· cited 4×