Skip to main content
· 12/31/1974

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Growth Co., S.A.

Citations

  • 391 F. Supp. 593
  • 20 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 535
  • 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • hearing to set aside the injunction and receivership effectively vitiates any inadequacies in the notice
  • hearing to set aside the injunction and receivership effectively vitiates any inadequacies in the notice
  • \sufficiency of notice is for the trial court's determination under the circumstances of each particular case\
  • Puerto Rico is a territory for purposes of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
  • “Notice [of the TRO] was effectively given even though technically these defendants were not yet properly served with the summons and complaint.”
  • “sufficiency of notice is for the trial court’s determination under the circumstances of each particular ease”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.