N.D. Illinois· 9/8/2003
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Buntrock
Citations
- 217 F.R.D. 441
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18841
- 2003 WL 22097295
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prohibiting deposition of SEC counsel because the defendant “clearly seeks not the facts, but the manner in which the SEC intends to marshal them”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bobrick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lindley v. Life Investors InsuranceN.D. Oklahoma· 2010-02-17· cited 25×
- First Financial Bank, N.A. v. BauknechtC.D. Illinois· 2014-10-24· cited 11×
- Wachovia Securities, LLC v. Nola, LLCN.D. Illinois· 2008-02-14· cited 4×
- B.H. v. Gold Fields Mining Corp.N.D. Oklahoma· 2005-12-07· cited 3×
- People v. Super. Ct. (Credit One Bank)California Court of Appeal· 2025-07-03
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Eighth Circuit· 1986-12-02· cited 374×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. MorelliS.D. New York· 1992-07-30· cited 61×
- Protective National Insurance v. Commonwealth InsuranceD. Nebraska· 1989-03-16· cited 38×
- Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Federal Savings BankN.D. Illinois· 1995-06-29· cited 25×
- Blanchard v. EdgeMark Financial Corp.N.D. Illinois· 2000-02-18· cited 24×
- Greene, Tweed of Delaware, Inc. v. Dupont Dow Elastomers, L.L.C.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-05-03· cited 21×
- In re Convergent Technologies Second Half 1984 Securities LitigationN.D. California· 1988-10-28· cited 20×
- Harriston v. Chicago Tribune Co.N.D. Illinois· 1990-12-27· cited 13×
- Marco Island Partners v. Oak Development Corp.N.D. Illinois· 1987-10-29· cited 12×
- M & R Amusements Corp. v. BlairN.D. Illinois· 1992-05-19· cited 12×
- Delores Brown v. Clarence Trigg and Indiana Attorney GeneralSeventh Circuit· 1986-05-28· cited 10×
- Lance, Inc. v. GinsburgE.D. Pennsylvania· 1962-11-27· cited 10×
- Floe v. PlowdenE.D. South Carolina· 1950-10-20· cited 10×
- Canel v. Lincoln National BankN.D. Illinois· 1998-04-30· cited 6×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. HBE Corp.E.D. Missouri· 1994-07-26· cited 5×
- Prevue Pet Products, Inc. v. Avian Adventures, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2001-04-23· cited 3×
- Johnstone Ex Rel. Tarragon Realty Investors, Inc. v. WabickN.D. Illinois· 2002-09-16· cited 2×
- United States v. Lomar Discount LimitedN.D. Illinois· 1973-11-21· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.