Securities and Exchange Commission v. Paul A. Bilzerian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an evidentiary hearing was not required to issue a permanent injunction despite a party’s assurances that he would not violate securities laws in the future
• holding that the defendant’s multiple, deliberate misrepresentations constituted a pattern warranting an injunction
• determining that the defendant’s pattern of flagrant conduct warranted an injunction
• affirming district court’s grant of partial summary judgment based on collateral estoppel effect of the defendant’s criminal conviction
• noting the equitable nature of disgorgement, as the court “order[s] [the defendant] to give up only his ill-gotten gains” and “d[oes] not subject him to an additional penalty”
• resolving challenge to calculation of disgorgement amount

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).