Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jack Lavin and Robin Lavin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing as involuntary those “disclosures by third parties over whom the holder of the privilege has virtually no control”
• detailing privilege holders’ efforts to intervene in each proceeding in which the issue of their privilege arose
• “[W]e know of no case ... that requires a privilege holder to engage in a preemptive strike to prevent further disclosure of involuntarily disclosed, privileged materials ....”
• for privilege to apply, “communication must have been made in confidence”
• applying the marital communications privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).