Secretary of Labor v. Beverly Healthcare-Hillview

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• OSHA’s interpretation of “at no cost” includes compensation for testing time and travel expenses
• “Before we assess … whether Beverly had fair notice of that interpretation, we must determine whether the meaning of regulatory language is ‘free from doubt.’ … If Beverly is correct [that the language is unambiguous], our inquiry would be at an end.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).