Secrest v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the sham affidavit doctrine applies to stop a party from manufacturing a factual dispute by submitting testimony from an expert whom she tendered
• holding that a party is prohibited “from defeating summary judgment simply by submitting an affidavit that contradicts the party’s previous sworn testimony”
• holding that a party is prohibited “from defeating summary judgment simply by submitting an affidavit that contradicts the party’s previous sworn testimony”
• holding that a party is prohibited “from defeating summary judgment simply by submitting an affidavit that contradicts the party’s previous sworn testimony”
• holding that a party is prohibited “from defeating summary judgment simply by submitting an affidavit that contradicts the party’s previous sworn testimony”
• holding that the sham 11 affidavit doctrine applies to stop a party from manufacturing a 12 factual dispute by submitting testimony from an expert whom she 13 tendered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).