Skip to main content
· 5/29/2002

Sechler Family Partnership v. Prime Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 567 S.E.2d 24
  • 255 Ga. App. 854
  • 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 1569
  • 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 688

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to adopt a standard for reviewing discovery requests made to a non-party that differed from the standard for requests made to another party
  • trial court did not err in denying motion to quash subpoena seeking nonparties' financial information
  • appeal following contempt citation was first opportunity to enumerate errors in underlying court order
  • discovery requested from nonparties must be relevant and nonprivileged
  • “discovery of nonprivileged documents also applies to nonparties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Blackburn, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.