SEC v. Rashid

Oral argument

• Argued

  57 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a district court decision refusing to modify a consent decree that enjoined the defendant from infringing plaintiff's patent, but noting that less stringent Rufo modification standard applies to institutional consent decrees
• “[A]n intervening change in law is a factor to be weighed, along with other aspects of the particular case, against the public and private interest in finality of judgments.”
• “[A]n interven- ing change in law is a factor to be weighed, along with other aspects of the particular case, against the public and private interest in finality of judgments.”
• differentiating institutional reform cases from consent decrees settling commercial disputes
• finality after consent judgment parallels adjudication after a full trial
• affirming denial of a request under 60(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).