Sebunya v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that judgment entered erroneously under Rule 55(b)(1) was voidable, not void
• stating a clerk’s error under Rule 55 “presents a problem of a voidable judgment within the meaning of Rule 60(b)(6) and not a void one pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4)”
• federal district court recognized that a default judgment entered in that court was “presumptively valid” when considering a motion to vacate the default judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).