Sebetic v. Hagerty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “no spouse policy” did not significantly interfere with the right to marry because it was “a reasonable public-safety measure with minimal residual impact on the decision to marry” and did not “deter the plaintiffs themselves from getting married”
• equal protection and substantive due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).