Sebesta v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a close friendship did not exist when agent and defendant had only known each other for two years and knew each other by name only
• if evidence of entrapment is admitted, the State must disprove entrapment beyond a reasonable doubt
• “This is purely an objective test, and the trier of fact’s vision should focus solely upon the State’s actions.”
• repeated, annoying telephone calls not sufficient to establish entrapment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).