Seber v. Union Pacific Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An easement is a non-possessory interest in another’s property that authorizes the holder to use that property for a particular purpose.”
• \We have not identified and the parties do not cite any Texas authority applying this `continued necessity' rule to an otherwise valid implied easement by prior use\
• “We have not identified and the parties do not cite any Texas authority applying this 'continued necessity' rule to an otherwise valid implied easement by prior use”
• “We have not identified and the parties do not cite any Texas authority applying this „continued necessity‟ rule to an otherwise valid implied easement by prior use”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).