Skip to main content
· 10/2/1998

Sebastian C. Simmons v. Howard University and Metropolitan Special Police Officers Federation

Citations

  • 157 F.3d 914
  • 332 U.S. App. D.C. 321
  • 159 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2385
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 24525
  • 1998 WL 673192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that hybrid Section 301 claims involve allegations that the employer breached the CBA combined with allegations that the union breached its statutory DFR
  • stating that the limitations period may be tolled “when the plaintiff is fraudulently induced to delay filing his suit” or “in good faith attempts to exhaust grievance procedures”
  • charge alleged that the union had “refuse[d] to provide fair representation to” the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Sentelle, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.