Seay v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff knew or should have known on date of accident that tortfeasors’ vehicles “were unidentified and therefore presumptively uninsured”
• concluding that where terms of insurance contract called for arbitration in accordance with provisions of the 1927 Act, section 7320 of the 1980 Act still governed appealability of the order confirming the arbitration award
• stating that under the Arbitration Act, arbitration awards must be reduced to judgment before they may be appealed
• holding the 30-day appeal period begins to run from the entry of judgment on an arbitration award, and not from the entry of the order confirming the award
• where terms of insurance contract called for arbitration in accordance with provisions of 1927 Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 7320 still governed appealability of order confirming arbitration award
• where terms of insurance contract called for arbitration in accordance with provisions of 1927 Act, 42 Pa.C.S.[A.] § 7320 still governed appealability of order confirming arbitration award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).