Seay v. Hopkins, Smith & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “Just Bulbs” is not generic because “there are multiple other ways to designate a store selling primarily light bulbs.”
• affirming Horseshoe Bay’s holding that each use of a trademarked domain name restarts the limitations period
• noting how the Texas Anti-Dilution statute was recodified to redefine the requisite claim required for a dilution claim and to “make the Texas dilution standard substantially consistent’ with federal law”
• noting how the Texas Anti-Dilution statute was recodified to redefine the requisite claim required for a dilution claim and to “make the Texas dilution standard substantially consistent’ with federal law”
• “Defendant’s use of Plaintiff’s trademark in its Domain Name is a continuing harm”
• “Defendant’s use of Plaintiff’s trademark in its Domain Name is a continuing harm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).