Seawell v. HARGARTEN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] misunderstanding cannot result in agreement” for contractual or novation purposes
• concluding “a misunderstanding cannot result in agreement or to a ‘meeting of the minds’ required to form a contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).