Seaview Awning Shutters of Miami, Inc. v. E. M. Eisfield, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the disposition “is subject to frequent, mandatory review by the [juvenile] court”
• stating, “if we were to deem all [juvenile court] review orders subject to appeal, we would be engaging in rulemaking, a function within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court[]”
• explaining that court's dispositional order triggered right of appeal
• “[A] committed Juvenile does not have the right to appeal from a review order that continues his commitment in the same manner and place and that maintains the status quo”
• “We hold … that a committed juvenile does not have the right to appeal from a review order that continues his commitment in the same manner and place and that maintains the status quo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).