Seattle Turning & Scroll Works v. Eckloff

Citations

• 63 Wash. 82
• 114 P. 893
• 1911 Wash. LEXIS 1160

Syllabus

<p>Appeal and Error — Review—Findings—Conclusiveness. Error cannot he urged in failing to allow defendant’s entire cross-claim for damages for delay, where the same was put in issue, the evidence was not all brought up on appeal, the statement of facts recites that evidence was introduced tending to support the findings of fact made by the court, and the court found that the cross-claim for damages was not proven except as to the items allowed.</p>