Skip to main content
· 10/15/1985

Seattle-First National Bank v. Federal Deposit Insurance

Citations

  • 619 F. Supp. 1351
  • 84 A.L.R. Fed. 305
  • 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1378
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14938

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Most (though not all) of the circuit courts ... have held that an issuing and a confirming bank are entitled to demand a beneficiary’s ‘strict compliance’ with the terms of presentment specified in a letter of credit.”
  • \Most (though not all) of the circuit courts ... have held that an issuing and a confirming bank are entitled to demand a beneficiary's `strict compliance' with the terms of presentment specified in a letter of credit.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David L. Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.