· 10/15/1985
Seattle-First National Bank v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Citations
- 619 F. Supp. 1351
- 84 A.L.R. Fed. 305
- 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1378
- 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14938
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Most (though not all) of the circuit courts ... have held that an issuing and a confirming bank are entitled to demand a beneficiary’s ‘strict compliance’ with the terms of presentment specified in a letter of credit.”
- \Most (though not all) of the circuit courts ... have held that an issuing and a confirming bank are entitled to demand a beneficiary's `strict compliance' with the terms of presentment specified in a letter of credit.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: David L. Russell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.