Skip to main content
· 11/26/2002

Seaton v. City of Lexington

Citations

  • 97 S.W.3d 72
  • 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2290
  • 2002 WL 31652325

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The granting of summary judgment will not be set aside on review if supportable on any theory because the primary concern of the appellate court is the correctness of the result in the trial court, not the route taken to reach it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ulrich, Spinden, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.