Seater v. Klamath Irrigation Dist.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding ORS 659A.199 applies to reports of a supervisor’s wrongdoing made “directly to a supervisor to correct what could possibly be merely an oversight” because it was contemplated during legislative hearings for a similar whistleblower statute
• concluding ORS 659A.199 applies to reports of a supervisor’s wrongdoing made “directly to a supervisor to correct what could possibly be merely an oversight” because it was contemplated during legislative hearings for a similar whistleblower statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Seater v. Klamath Irrigation Dist.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-11-14· cited 1×
• Mirkovic v. Tenasys Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-01

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• Matteo Brunozzi v. Cable Communications, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-03-21· cited 88×
• Sherertz v. Brownstein Rask
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-09· cited 37×
• Burley v. Clackamas Cnty.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-07-10· cited 21×
• Huber v. Oregon Department of Education
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-05-05· cited 17×
• Bjurstrom v. Oregon Lottery
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-10-12· cited 13×
• Folz v. State ex rel. Oregon Department of Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-09-07· cited 13×
• Seater v. Klamath Irrigation Dist.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-11-14· cited 1×

Other cases named Seater v. Klamath Irrigation Dist.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Seater v. Klamath Irrigation Dist.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-11-14· cited 1×