Seaside Resorts, Inc. v. Club Car, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting N.C.G.S. § 25-2-607(3)(a) to require “a retail buyer to notify only the retail seller who tendered the goods to him, not wholesalers, distributors, manufacturers, or others who sold the goods further up the chain of commerce”
• refusing to find a private right of action for “a criminal statute which provides only for criminal sanctions” because “[t]he primary consideration in deciding whether a private cause of action should be implied under a criminal statute is legislative intent”
• wherein the court held because plaintiff produced compelling circumstantial evidence to prove a defect existed in a product that had been totally destroyed by fire, the issue as to the cause of the fire was one for the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).