Seashore Ambulatory Surg. Ctr. v. Dept. of Health

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the clear language of the act providing that a CON was needed for new health care project limited the exemption clause from applying to other situations not specified in the clause
• explaining that \retroactive application can only apply if such application will not result in 'manifest injustice' to a party adversely affected\ (quoting Gibbons v. Gibbons, 86 N.J. 515, 523 (1981))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).