Sears v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting contention that offenses from separate indictments were improperly consolidated for trial where “the record disclose[d] that both the appellant and the State were satisfied to have the three indictments tried at the same time”
• rejecting contention that offenses from separate indictments were improperly consolidated for trial where “the record disclose[d] that both the appellant and the State were satisfied to have the three indictments tried at the same time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Taylor v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-01-27· cited 35×
• Mason v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-08-11· cited 32×
• Street v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-05-28· cited 26×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stevens v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-06-17· cited 61×
• Strawderman v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-08-14· cited 57×
• Graef v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-04-14· cited 44×
• McLaughlin v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-04-03· cited 40×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-02-10· cited 33×
• Rozzell v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-10-02· cited 16×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1962-10-16· cited 6×
• Briscoe v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-04-01· cited 6×