· 7/27/1987
Sears v. Penney (In Re Penney)
Citations
- 76 B.R. 160
- 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 1577
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that it was nonsense for creditor to believe it could circumvent the automatic stay by filing an adversary proceeding asserting a pre-petition claim
- creditor cannot initiate adversary proceeding under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7001 without leave of court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alan Jaroslovsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.