Skip to main content
· 7/27/1987

Sears v. Penney (In Re Penney)

Citations

  • 76 B.R. 160
  • 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 1577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that it was nonsense for creditor to believe it could circumvent the automatic stay by filing an adversary proceeding asserting a pre-petition claim
  • creditor cannot initiate adversary proceeding under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7001 without leave of court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alan Jaroslovsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.