Sears v. Hodges (In Re Hodges)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that as a matter of law nondischargeability actions do not violate the stay because “[a]n action taken in the bankruptcy court can only be a violation of the automatic stay when there is no basis under the Code for the action”
• finding that as a matter of law nondischargeability actions do not violate the stay because “[a]n action taken in the bankruptcy court can only be a violation of the automatic stay when there is no basis under the Code for the action”
• “[a]n action taken in the bankruptcy court can only be found to be a violation of the automatic stay when there is no basis under the Code for the action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).