Skip to main content
· 5/18/1897

Sears v. Flodstrom

Citations

  • 5 Idaho 314
  • 49 P. 11
  • 1897 Ida. LEXIS 25

Syllabus

<p>■Conflicting Evidence — Finding of Jury. — Where the sole question in a case is one of fact, and the evidence is conflicting, the finding of the jury will not be disturbed.</p> <p>“Original Promise to Pay for Goods Furnished Another — Not Within Statute of Frauds. — Defendant was proprietor of a meat market. Plaintiff was owner of a boarding-house, which he rented to a tenant, who was a woman and a stranger to plaintiff. Defendant introduced his tenant to plaintiff and requested him to let her have such meats as she required and charge the same to him. Held, that defendant was liable for balance of account for meats so delivered to the tenant of defendant; the promise being an original one, and not within the statute of frauds.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • slippery platform surrounding swimming pool

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huston, Quaeles, Quarles, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.