Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Ulman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the discovery rule applied in case where defendant allegedly filed a false credit report with a credit agency
• stating that a potential tort plaintiff is usually immediately aware of wrongdoing
• Maryland statute of limitations in defamation action runs not from date of defamatory act but from date plaintiff learned of it
• Maryland statute of limitations in defamation action runs not from date of defamatory act but from date plaintiff learned of it
• credit reporting agency's false report inherently undiscoverable until plaintiff applied for a credit account with a second retailer
• \fairness to a plaintiff who has not slept on his rights justifies exceptions to [the] general rule\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).